Sprint, the nation’s
leading network carrier is reducing their capital spending by 36 percent this
year. The corporation believes that this step can help conserve cash and
improve its wireless network and also help add consumers in this increasingly
competitive market.
The operator, which
is mired in debt and losses, is planning to cut spending to $3 billion from
$4.7 billion in fiscal 2015. Though Sprint’s Chief Executive Officer Marcelo
Claure has said that their mobile network is state-of-art enough to lure
customers from other major network carriers, including Verizon Communications Inc.,
AT&T Inc., and T-Mobile US Inc., the analysts are taking the move as a
spending squeeze which can leave the carrier behind its rivals.
“The punch line here
is that we are building our network, we are not delaying any spending and, more
importantly, we are building our network way smarter than we did in the past,”
Claure said. Sprint, now the No. 4 carrier, faces the challenge of cutting
$2 billion in annual costs, while raising cash and attracting new subscribers
to a faster network.
In a break from
convention, Sprint is looking for alternatives to cut 20-year agreements with
tower companies, and has decided to put small antennas & transceivers on
building rooftops & utility poles in some areas to improve signal
reception.
“This is largely a
deferral of capital spending from 2016 to 2017, again, a move towards
sustainability rather than growth,” Craig Moffett, an analyst at
MoffettNathanson LLC said in a note Tuesday. Moffett, who has a sell rating on
the stock, described Sprint as “spectrum-rich but network poor.” The carrier’s
plan to make the most use out of a vast trove of 2.5 gigahertz spectrum is
“taking longer than expected and will mostly come in 2017 rather than 2016,” he
wrote.
Overall, the cost
cuts helped make up for a lower amount of subscriber additions than estimated.
Also, the sources say, “Adjusted earnings before interest, depreciation and
amortization for the fiscal fourth quarter, which ended March 31, was $2.16
billion, compared with a $2.02 billion average of estimates compiled by
Bloomberg. The company cut $1.3 billion in expenses in the fiscal year”.
No comments:
Post a Comment