According to AT&T, the FCC
might just end up losing a legal battle if it plunges ahead with its decision
to increase Internet regulation with the approach it is trying to follow. The
intent behind the FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler’s decision in this case is that he
wants to avoid Internet providers from blocking some websites which the consumers
wish to visit. Or the incidence of charging more to Netflix or YouTube for fast
lanes to your houses. To that end, the FCC Chairman is trying to release a heavier
regulation of the Internet. He also prepared to propose new rules in this
regard very soon. If the broadband ends up being a public utility, the FCC
would be able to have far more information and insight into the type of
network-access arrangements that Internet providers make with content providers
like Netflix and Google.
In a very lightly veiled threat,
AT&T has made it clear that it will ultimately sue to discourage the FCC
from asserting the authority and going ahead with the idea it shared. However, the
FCC has not even formally announced the rules and regulations it is thinking to
lay down yet and still, the telecoms are already up for fighting a legal battle
against it.
AT&T has stated two reasons
for the FCC’s decision not turning into a reality. First, it claims that the
FCC cannot view Internet providers as telecom-like utilities because the FCC
itself termed them as "information providers" way back in 2002. The
second reason is that the FCC hasn’t performed a study to prove that Internet
providers in a certain geographic area act like monopolistic “common carriers,”
like the old Bell System. In an interview with CNET last month, Wheeler said he
was indeed ready for battle, if there is one.
No comments:
Post a Comment